Beverly Neufeld

Equal Pay in the New Administration

A new, self-proclaimed feminist President pledges to support fair pay legislation. Now it is up to the Senate to do the same.

On this month’s cover of Ms. Magazine, “Superman Obama” rips open his shirt to reveal the message, “This is what a feminist looks like.” That’s good news for American women and families, but what President Obama needs now is a “feminist” Senate.

After long delay, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act finally reached the Senate floor last Thursday for its first test, a vote to move it to a floor debate. It passed 72-23, an overwhelming margin.

Already approved by the House, this legislation will reverse the 2007 Supreme Court ruling that took the teeth out of wage discrimination law. Under the ruling, a victim of wage discrimination must file a claim within 180 days of the initial act of discrimination—such as the issuance of an inequitable pay check. So, even if the discrimination continues for years, as it did for Lilly Ledbetter at a Goodyear Tire plant, the employee loses legal recourse. It seems obvious that workers are not aware of, or ready to act on, suspected discrimination within the first 6 months of work, especially when many employers threaten retaliation for sharing salary information.

The next test for Ledbetter remains: passage without weakening amendments. This is not assured, which is why many advocacy groups like the National Women’s Law Center are encouraging concerned citizens to call their Senator before the vote, which could happen any day now.

The passage of Ledbetter as written will be a significant victory, but it puts us back to square one. To give the new administration the tools to end wage discrimination, a second comprehensive law – also passed last week by the House – is essential. The Paycheck Fairness Act would update the Equal Pay Act of 1963. Shepherded by departing Senator Clinton, it would create incentives for employer compliance with equal pay laws, rearm federal enforcement and outreach efforts, and encourage programs to help eliminate the persistent wage gap.

Unbelievably, we are still calculating the wage gap 45 years after President Kennedy signed the Equal Pay Act. Women are still only paid on average 78% of what their male counterparts make. That gap is real money and has a profound effect on women, their families and our communities, making equal pay a family pocketbook issue. Being underpaid today means making untenable choices everyday (healthcare or childcare?). It means smaller pensions for older women, making the current economic crisis especially punishing for this vulnerable, growing population.

There are other contributing factors to the gap, but one is simple: discrimination. Passage of both Ledbetter and Paycheck Fairness will address this. It will not solve the problem of persistent low wages for female-dominated jobs, or lack of access to male-dominated, nontraditional fields that can provide a living wage. It will not ensure that the economic stimulus package will benefit America’s working women. But, it is one step toward the promise of change. President Obama has made it clear. He is ready to sign strong equal pay laws: Ledbetter and Paycheck Fairness.

Now we need the Senate to deliver.

Learn more:
National Women’s Law Center:
New York Women’s Agenda Pay Equity Project:

Beverly Cooper Neufeld is currently Vice President of the New York Women’s Agenda and Coordinator of the Equal Pay Coalition NYC. A frequent commentator on women’s issues, she consults with groups on advocacy, organizational development, and strategic and program planning. Among other positions, Neufeld is the former Executive Director of The White House Project and Director of Finance for Congresswoman Lowey.

Beverly Neufeld: Author Bio | Other Posts
Posted at 8:28 AM, Jan 22, 2009 in Civil Rights
Permalink | Email to Friend


I hope Kia looks up the salary of her prior male predecessors who were far less productive, far less intelligent, far less learned. If she wants to sue for a pay disparity, I want to help her do so, in any way I can. I support accuracy in wages, and in her case, I am guessing she is underpaid.

The work of women and minorities is worth less than that of white males. Otherwise, hard nosed business people who know the value of everything they use to the penny would be paying more, including female and minority business owners. Do female employers pay female employees as much as they do male employees, more often? If the answer is no, then there is a compelling business reason.

If this tyrannical, left wing Commie government seeks to impose higher salaries on lower value workers, the unemployment rate among those groups will increase. No one wants to be forced to pay more than the value of the service. If litigation imposes hiring at the point of a gun, then outsourcing to more business friendly nations will explode, and the US economy will suffer.

If females do not like their salaries, let them start their own services and product manufacturing enterprises. They can pay whatever they please then.

Given the feminist control over the legal profession, and the relentless hunt for the white male, the next generation of workers will have inferior male performance. One can see that in the leading indicators of school drop out rates, and school grades, and the shifting sex distribution in education achievement. Males also have higher rates of all biological pathologies and generate a great deal more medical expense.

These laws will then be used to impose excessive high salaries on under-productive white males inferior performance.

Posted by: Supremacy Claus | January 22, 2009 4:38 PM