Everyone over three already knows this, about all products. The failure to warn claim is a pretextual, lawyer gotcha scam. All participants should go to jail, especially the black robed buffoon on the bench.
This is still no way to avoid a failure-to-warn lawsuit. Nothing ever is.
If someone bought a product from the dealer with the sign "we sell inconvenient and unsafe products," and that product blew up in his face and blinded him, you would still sue and claim that the warning was inadequate because it failed to specifically caution about blindness.
This is still no way to avoid a failure-to-warn lawsuit. Nothing ever is.
If someone bought a product from the dealer with the sign "we sell inconvenient and unsafe products," and that product blew up in his face and blinded him, you would still sue and claim that the warning was inadequate because it failed to specifically caution about blindness.
This is still no way to avoid a failure-to-warn lawsuit. Nothing ever is.
If someone bought a product from the dealer with the sign "we sell inconvenient and unsafe products," and that product blew up in his face and blinded him, you would still sue and claim that the warning was inadequate because it failed to specifically caution about blindness.
This is still no way to avoid a failure-to-warn lawsuit. Nothing ever is.
If someone bought a product from the dealer with the sign "we sell inconvenient and unsafe products," and that product blew up in his face and blinded him, you would still sue and claim that the warning was inadequate because it failed to specifically caution about blindness.
TortDeform.com, the Civil Justice Defense Blog, confronts and transcends the arguments put forth by the tort "reform" movement, working to ensure that all Americans can access the courts.
Comments
Everyone over three already knows this, about all products. The failure to warn claim is a pretextual, lawyer gotcha scam. All participants should go to jail, especially the black robed buffoon on the bench.
Posted by: Supremacy Claus | August 6, 2008 04:40 PM
How about a sign that states: "Our products are not safe when acts of stupidity and/or lack of self accountability are employed in their use."
Posted by: throckmorton | August 7, 2008 08:48 AM
Justinian,
This is still no way to avoid a failure-to-warn lawsuit. Nothing ever is.
If someone bought a product from the dealer with the sign "we sell inconvenient and unsafe products," and that product blew up in his face and blinded him, you would still sue and claim that the warning was inadequate because it failed to specifically caution about blindness.
Tell me I'm wrong.
Posted by: Elliot | August 7, 2008 03:56 PM
Justinian,
This is still no way to avoid a failure-to-warn lawsuit. Nothing ever is.
If someone bought a product from the dealer with the sign "we sell inconvenient and unsafe products," and that product blew up in his face and blinded him, you would still sue and claim that the warning was inadequate because it failed to specifically caution about blindness.
Tell me I'm wrong.
Posted by: Elliot | August 7, 2008 03:58 PM
Justinian,
This is still no way to avoid a failure-to-warn lawsuit. Nothing ever is.
If someone bought a product from the dealer with the sign "we sell inconvenient and unsafe products," and that product blew up in his face and blinded him, you would still sue and claim that the warning was inadequate because it failed to specifically caution about blindness.
Tell me I'm wrong.
Posted by: Elliot | August 7, 2008 04:00 PM
Justinian,
This is still no way to avoid a failure-to-warn lawsuit. Nothing ever is.
If someone bought a product from the dealer with the sign "we sell inconvenient and unsafe products," and that product blew up in his face and blinded him, you would still sue and claim that the warning was inadequate because it failed to specifically caution about blindness.
Tell me I'm wrong.
Posted by: Elliot | August 7, 2008 04:02 PM
Sorry for the multiple posts. I kept getting error messages.
Posted by: Elliot | August 7, 2008 04:11 PM