TortDeform: The Civil Justice Defense Blog

Kia Franklin

More on Docs Saying Sorry

The question of patient safety often gets subsumed by the tort “reform” debate—it becomes a matter of doctors versus lawyers, rather than a matter of the patients and their access to safe medical care, information about medical errors, and adequate compensation when wrongfully injured.

Which is why the recent New York Times editorial on disclosing and apologizing for medical errors, following up from a prior article, was so interesting. This increased attention to giving patients access to information, the lack of which is often the reason they sue, is very important. Doctors who voluntarily disclose what happened and apologize for it do not have increased chances of being sued—in fact, apologizing quells anger, another reason that confused and upset patients sue over injuries from medical errors.

This study and others give reason to question the assertion, made in the editorial, that the apology policy “helps reduce malpractice premiums.” But unsubstantiated insurance scapegoat for tort “reform” aside, the editorial makes some good points. From the editorial:

Admitting errors is only the first step toward reforming the health care system so that far fewer mistakes are made. But reforms can be more effective if doctors are candid about how they went astray. Patients seem far less angry when they receive an honest explanation, an apology and prompt, fair compensation for the harm they have suffered.

Eric Turkewitz writes a great post about this on his blog, saying that:

Just as in politics, and so many other things, the cover-up is often much worse than the initial mistake. Because while the accident may be negligence, the cover-up is an intentional act of deception. And when that deception comes from someone that you have trusted your life with, the sense of betrayal is profound. (Read the whole thing here)

I haven’t blogged about my personal experience with this issue yet, but I will at some point. (And for my dear tort “reformer” readers, no, I haven’t sued anyone). In the mean time I can say that all patients and their families want is information, a sense that doctors respect our intelligence, and a sense that the trust we have in our doctors won’t be compromised by a cover up culture in the profession. More disclosures mean increased patient trust and more transparent data about medical errors, which in turn could contribute to the development of more refined methods for reducing medical errors, thus preventing the need for apologies in the first place.

Posted at 10:24 AM, May 22, 2008 in Permalink | Comments (5) | TrackBack (0)


Comments

I agree that it is always a good thing to be truthful. What bothers me is the continued research that shows that it is not errors that lead to the majority of the suits but bad outcomes.

We have to fix the disparity between true errors and what is actually happening. By fixing this we do two things. First, we encourage healthcare providers to provide the best medical care as opposed to the best "medicolegal care". Secondly, we trully "raise the Bar" and bring justice to those who deserve it as opposed to raiding the insurance coffers to coffers of funds that would otherwise go to those trully deserving.

Posted by: throckmorton | May 22, 2008 02:11 PM

Why on earth would anyone want to help the dirtbag plaintiff lawyer with free discovery? This is a set up to get easy discovery started. Why don't the patient and the dirtbag plaintiff lawyer start the honesty game by admitting most cases are weak, designed to extract money in an extortion lottery, and have no merit. When this dirtbag admits most cases are weak and apologized to the defendants, then this dirtbag has the right to mislead as he does.

Posted by: Supremacy Claus | May 22, 2008 04:16 PM

I still await an apology from the dirtbag plaintiff lawyer for filing weak cases in 75% of times, ruining the lives of innocent defendants, and for causing defensive medicine, The dirtbag needs to shut his hole until that apology is received in writing and in public.

Posted by: Supremacy Claus | May 23, 2008 06:50 PM

Only a fraction of medical errors turn into a claim file. Maybe 1-3%. Fixing human error is impossible. Cutting the # of errors will not effectively cut the number of cases. In 22 years adjusting med mal claims, the mistakes are always due to communication and/ or staffing. fix that!! There are 18 types of medication errors alone: wrong: guy, dose, time, concentration, drug etc. Wrong sided surgery is epidemic, should be completely avoidable. Mistakes happen- goofy mistakes are the problem- Concentrate and communicate. you cant legislate or purchase either. Maybe its time for med school to have med mal classes- jim

Posted by: jim ohare aic, ais vp claims | May 27, 2008 08:46 AM

throckmorton, assuming the research you cite is correct, that concerns me too--because what it says is that doctors are getting away with malpractice unless it has such a bad outcome that the resulting damages make it economically feasible to bring a lawsuit. Doctors shouldn't be blamed for things that aren't their fault; but shouldn't they be responsible for things that are, rather than burying their mistakes?

Posted by: mythago | May 31, 2008 12:02 PM


Post a comment

Verification: