Kia Franklin
FISA’s in the House (but it’s no house party).
Yesterday was a heartbreaker for our civil liberties and our right to enforce them through the civil justice system. Now, Bush is on to pressuring the House to pass the Senate’s version of the FISA Amendments Act of 2007, which provides retroactive immunity to companies that illegally spied on American citizens. (You heard me right).
Bush said he would not agree to giving the House more time to debate a measure the Senate passed Tuesday governing the government’s ability to work with telecommunications companies to eavesdrop on phone calls and e-mails between suspected terrorists. The bill gives phone companies retroactive protection from lawsuits filed on the basis of cooperation they gave the government without court permission - something Bush insisted was included in the bill.About 40 lawsuits have been filed against telecom companies by people alleging violations of wiretapping and privacy laws. The House did not include the immunity provision in a similar bill it passed last year.
“In order to be able to discover … the enemy’s plans, we need the cooperation of telecommunication companies,” Bush said. “If these companies are subjected to lawsuits that could cost them billions of dollars, they won’t participate. They won’t help us. They won’t help protect America.”
That’s a lie. A plain-faced lie. To which Reid responded:
“The president could have taken the simple step of requesting new authority from Congress … but whether out of convenience, incompetence, or outright disdain for the rule of law, the administration chose to ignore Congress and ignore the Constitution,” Reid said.“Due to months of White House foot-dragging, the relevant House committees have only just gotten important documents related to whether the Bush Administration followed the law and the Constitution,” he said. “They need some time to review and analyze them. We must not let this critical issue be resolved by White House bullying.”
Preach it. Let’s see… what else have I got on this? Senator Dodd gave a final speech on the Senate’s (terrible, wrong, devastating, depressing) vote, and you can read or watch it here.
That’s all I have to say about that right now. Gotta be careful what I say these days… never know who’s watching/reading/listening…
Posted at 4:29 PM, Feb 13, 2008 in Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)







Comments
Too many Democrats are beholden to the trial lawyers for Pelosi to allow a straight up and down vote. I have never seen her approve a measure that reduces the plaintiff bar's income by one cent and I don't expect her to be any less of a trial lawyer's shill now
Posted by: Paul W Dennis | February 18, 2008 05:42 PM
And the rest of the representatives, clearly, are beholden to corporations and corporate interest groups. Every issue of significance to our legal rights can be dismissed as a "trial lawyer" issue, but let's not downplay what this issue means for our civil liberties.
Posted by: Kia | February 19, 2008 09:51 AM
If you want, you can dismiss any and every issue of significance to our legal rights, no matter how great the rights at stake, by pegging it a "trial lawyer" issue. But apparently the rest of the representatives are beholden to corporations and corporate interest groups. I suppose this is a fact of politics but it doesn't mean it's ok. And aside from that, let's not downplay what this issue means for our civil liberties. Whatever alliances politicians choose to make, I want my rights intact.
Posted by: Kia | February 19, 2008 09:56 AM