Eric Turkewitz

Jury Duty Stamps — Get ‘Em While They’re Hot!!

Cross-posted from New York Personal Injury Law Blog:


Credit New York Chief Judge Judith Kaye for the idea. Last week the United States Postal Service unveiled, at the New York County Courthouse where I picked my first jury and tried my first case, Jury Duty stamps.

Now it's been a few years since I've used stamps in the office, finally buckling to using the utterly boring Pitney Bowes stamping machine. But mine is a small practice and I get to make the rules, so now the stamps will be coming back for some uses.

I feel pretty strongly about the jury system. After all, other than the draft it is the only time the government asks you to drop what you are doing and check in for mandatory civil service. In New York, everyone is called for jury duty, no exceptions. The idea of empowering a select group of robed politicians to make decisions that affect liberty, or to decide who was right or wrong in a civil dispute, was too much for our nation's founders. Anyone who read about the crying Anna Nicole Smith judge and the very deliberative Scooter Libby jury can appreciate this concept.

So we have not one, but two parts of the Bill of Rights that guarantee those rights: The Sixth Amendment to protect those charged with crimes and the Seventh Amendment to guarantee juries in civil trials:

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

And this is important because there is no shortage of big business type folks looking for ways to strip that right away, either by forcing arbitration without jurors, or creating some kind of "health courts" or other devices to let the biased decide matters instead of the unbiased.

Of course, there are always some who want to avoid jury duty at all costs. (No doubt they would feel differently if they were the ones in the middle of it all.) But sticking in my brain is a story of one of the greatest juries of all time: The one that tried William Penn in the 1600s, which I recounted back in February while pulling together some quotes on jury nullification.

Perhaps these stamps, if widely used, will be one tiny way to remind recipients of one of the cornerstones of our country's liberty: Power shall not rest with the few but with the many. And that is what jury duty is all about.

You can buy the stamps here. And attorneys, more so than anyone else, should be using them.

(Eric Turkewitz is a personal injury attorney in New York)

Eric Turkewitz: Author Bio | Other Posts
Posted at 10:04 AM, Sep 19, 2007 in Civil Justice
Permalink | Email to Friend


Eric: The more I learn, the more I support jury trials.

Here are some problems. In the past, the jury had knowledge. They had walked the boundaries at the time of the transfer of land. They knew the criminal's habits from childhood. The lawyer has eradicated such knowledgeable jurors from the court. The lawyer wants ignorant, naive, uneducated people to succumb to his fairy tale spinning. The lawyer has perverted the intended and greatest benefit of the wisdom of the crowd effect of the jury system.

In your book, the jury is good enough to regulate very technical and complex enterprises.

Yet, the jury cannot regulate the lawyer to reduce the massive injuries suffered by adverse third parties from lawyer carelessness. Only their paid off pal, the land pirate on the bench, one of them is qualified to regulate the fellow land pirate.

Lastly, judges bash juries who find laws and their commands unjust, and deliver justice despite all the wrongheaded controls imposed by the land pirate.

You have to address those inconsistencies, or else it's just your habitual, standard, misleading, self-serving, bad faith.

I know you will never, never, never address the regulation of the lawyer by the jury.

Posted by: Supremacy Claus | September 19, 2007 1:31 PM

I have served on juries on multiple occaseions.

Unfortunately many of the "brightest and best" seek to avoid jury duty. Part of the problem is that by being summoned to jury duty you often lose nearly as much time when not selected to a jury as you do when you are actually selected for a trial.

It is disheartening to sit through the voir dire process and realize that criminal defense and personal injury plaintiff attorneys are doing their best to "dumb down" the jury so as to create maximum acceptance of arguments geared to emotions and not logic. There should be no premptory juror strikes, only strikes for cause

Why should you go through the effort to serve on a jury under the current circumstances ? No body appreciates your efforts anyway and if you are self-employed, you are losing money, to boot

Posted by: Paul W Dennis | September 19, 2007 7:37 PM