TorteDeForm

Cyrus Dugger

Bush’s Tort “Reform” Routine Returns

Bush renews call for tort reform
President's criticism of suits is rejected by lawyers association

By Ameet Sachdev
Tribune staff reporter
Published February 8, 2007
President Bush again is taking jabs at medical malpractice lawyers and calling for nationwide tort reform.

"I'm worried about frivolous lawsuits that are running up the cost of health care," the president said on a visit to Caterpillar Inc.'s Peoria headquarters last week, revisiting an issue that has been near the top of his agenda since he entered office. " . . . And when somebody gets sued all the time, they practice more medicine than is necessary and it runs up your cost."

The line prompted an immediate response critical of Bush's statement from a national advocacy and lobbying group for trial lawyers.

................

The hostile rhetoric is part of a renewed debate on changes to the legal system, "tort reform" in political lingo. After letting the issue simmer last year, the president is again leading the discussion, framing it as a barrier to economic growth.

A day after he came to Illinois, Bush said in New York that "excessive lawsuits will make it hard for America to remain the economic leader that we want to be." In his State of the Union address last month, Bush called on Congress to pass legislation this year that would limit damage awards in medical malpractice cases.

But unlike the past six years, Bush's legal agenda is likely to be ignored. Congress is under the control of Democrats, who have generally not supported efforts to scale back the types of lawsuits people can file and how much they can recover. Many find tort reform legislation overly pro-business and against the interests of consumers. In addition, trial lawyers are among the Democrats' biggest financial supporters.

Any efforts to further reform the litigation system will face formidable opposition from Vermont Democrat Patrick Leahy, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

…………………

"Proposals such as arbitrary caps on medical malpractice claims do little to protect true victims while limiting Americans' legal rights and access to justice," said Schmaler, Leahy's spokesperson. (link)

For the Drum Major Institute response to Bush’s stance and proposals on this issue, click here, or read it after the jump.

For the Center for Justice & Democracy fact sheet on medical malpractice, click here.
For the Public Citizen report on medical malpractice, click here.
For other related posts on Tort Deform, click here.

DMI on the 2007 State of the Union
Health Care:

Malpractice Liability Caps

President Bush: We should work to decrease the cost of medical care by reducing medical errors and limiting liability for medical malpractice.

· “We need to…reduce costs and medical errors with better information technology… and protect good doctors from junk lawsuits by passing medical liability reform.”

DMI SAYS: “We agree that reducing medical errors will decrease the cost of medical care. However, Bush’s proposal to limit liability for medical malpractice will only increase the frequency of medical errors because it eliminates a critical incentive for maintaining high quality patient care.”

* President Bush is right that part of the reason for the high cost of health care is the high number of medical errors.
* However, in the second part of his proposal, President Bush calls for capping medical malpractice liability. Capping malpractice liability limits the amount of money patients can receive when injured by their doctor’s negligence, and can effectively grant doctors immunity from the consequences of their malpractice. Capping liability for lawsuits is actually likely to increase the amount of medical errors that Bush agrees contribute to the cost of healthcare.
* The President’s own logic undercuts his call to implement these liability caps. In the absence of the “better information technology” that Bush agrees will “reduce medical costs and errors,” the threat of malpractice lawsuits is one of the primary means of controlling medical errors and their increased costs, as well the primary means of holding bad doctors accountable. Moreover, lawsuits are the only means of actually compensating the injured victims of medical malpractice.
* The President’s proposal would eliminate a critical incentive for maintaining high quality patient care. Most doctors are good doctors. Indeed, only a small group of “bad” doctors (5.9%) are responsible for the majority of all medical malpractice payments (57.8%). Because medical professional associations rarely discipline even the worst members of their profession, there are few other means available aside from lawsuits for holding them accountable.
* Instead of protecting “good” doctors from “junk” lawsuits, President Bush’s proposal mechanically protects all doctors whenever they make any kind of mistake. Just like good people do bad things, good doctors sometimes make mistakes and injure people who need to be compensated.
* Medical malpractice liability costs – including all malpractice payouts, settlements, and legal fees – only account for 1 percent of the nation’s health care expenditures. Clearly, this is not a significant contributor to rising health care costs. Indeed, even the Congressional Budget Office found that implementing Bush’s proposal would only reduce health care costs by at most half of one percent.
* One guaranteed way to reduce the cost of medical care is not to “reform” malpractice lawsuits, but to enact patient safety reforms that will reduce the current 44,000-98,000 annual deaths and 300,000 annual injuries resulting from preventable medical errors, as well as the $1.5 million medication errors that total $3.5 billion in unnecessary expenses each year. In short, the best way to get rid of the lawsuits President Bush complained about this evening is to modernize the practice of medicine and eliminate the avoidable medical errors that are the only reason these lawsuits exist.
* Bush’s liability caps would also fall disproportionately on women, people of color, children, the elderly, and working people.

Relevant Statistics:

· Percentage of health care costs in the U.S. that can be directly tied to malpractice lawsuits, settlements, and payments: 1

· Percent by which medical malpractice legislation championed by the President would decrease health insurance premiums and health care expenditures: .04 -.05

· Number of hospital deaths each year that are attributable to preventable medical errors: 44,000 - 98,000

· Number of hospital injuries each year that are attributable to preventable medical errors: 300,000

· Total amount of annual medication errors that are preventable: 1.5 million

· Amount that these medication errors cost each year: $3.5

· Amount that each preventable medication error adds to the cost of the inflicted individual’s hospital stay: $8,750

· Percentage of doctors with 10 or more malpractice liability payments that received no disciplinary action from their state medical board: 67

Cyrus Dugger: Author Bio | Other Posts
Posted at 12:30 PM, Feb 08, 2007 in
Permalink | Email to Friend | Comment on this post